Code Review практики

Code review — critical для quality, knowledge sharing, security. Gaming context добавляет compliance dimension.

What to review

Correctness: logic, edge cases. Security: injection, auth, exposure. Performance: obvious bottlenecks. Testability: unit tests coverage. Readability: naming, structure. Domain: game math correct, compliance considered. Not review: style (linters), obvious typos (automated).

Process

Small PRs (<400 lines) — легче review, faster feedback. Meaningful title и description. Self-review before request. Multiple reviewers для critical code (payment, math). Reviews within 24h expected. Constructive language. Approvals required для merge.

Tools

GitHub PR reviews, GitLab MR. Reviewable, CodeStream: advanced tools. Automated: CodeClimate, SonarQube для static analysis. Danger.js для custom rules enforcement. AI review: GitHub Copilot, CodeRabbit — emerging.

Cultural aspects

Blameless discussion. Ego не важен: focus на код. Learn from reviews. Rotate reviewers для knowledge sharing. Senior reviewers для architectural decisions. Documented conventions (style guide). Reviews не bottleneck — они invest in future quality.